- create systemic social change through scaling
- serve a need which is either over-served (with too much complesx solutions) or underserved
- offer services or products that are simplier, less costly but good enough
- generate resources different ways than market competitors (such as donations, grants, volunteer man-power...)
- are being often ignored or sometimes encouraged by existing players for whom the business model is unprofitable
The key take-away for me the suggestion that tax classification -for profit versus nonprofit- is not a useful criteria for identifying catalytic innovators. That's new way of thinking for social change agents; for profit organisations might be a big contributor to social change. John Elkington and Pamela Hartigan's last book "The Power of Unreasonable People" suggests similar and describes 3 different types of Social Business
- Leveraged nonprofit ventures
- Mixed nonprofit ventures
- Social business ventures
I am still reading the book when I finish it, I will make a comprehensive entry about it


